[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5394f030-104c-f191-e581-4f1ed23a85a6@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:31:33 +0800
From: hejinyang <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Loongson: Fix complie errors without CONFIG_SMP
On 08/26/2020 09:01 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:53:27PM +0800, Jinyang He wrote:
>> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/topology.h
>> @@ -4,7 +4,11 @@
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> #define cpu_to_node(cpu) (cpu_logical_map(cpu) >> 2)
>> +#else
>> +#define cpu_to_node(cpu) 0
>> +#endif
> Are you saying you've enabled NUMA without enabling SMP? Does that make
> sense?
NUMA option normally work with more than two nodes, though Loongson64 use it
default after patch 6fbde6b492dfc761ad60a68fb2cb32b1eb05b786. Loongson64(3A)'s
each node consists of 4 cpus while it only has 4 cpus. In other words, it has
only one node while open NUMA. I'm confused it if NUMA deponds on SMP.
I'll try fix it with unabling NUMA and SMP later.
Thanks.:-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists