[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200828084851.GQ1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:48:51 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org
Cc: Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com, x86@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
rostedt@...dmis.org, naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
cameron@...dycamel.com, oleg@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] kprobes: Replace rp->free_instance with freelist
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 06:12:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> struct kretprobe_instance {
> union {
> + /*
> + * Dodgy as heck, this relies on not clobbering freelist::refs.
> + * llist: only clobbers freelist::next.
> + * rcu: clobbers both, but only after rp::freelist is gone.
> + */
> + struct freelist_node freelist;
> struct llist_node llist;
> - struct hlist_node hlist;
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
Masami, make sure to make this something like:
union {
struct freelist_node freelist;
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
struct llist_node llist;
for v4, because after some sleep I'm fairly sure what I wrote above was
broken.
We'll only use RCU once the freelist is gone, so sharing that storage
should still be okay.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists