[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200828085750.GR1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:57:50 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] seqlock: seqcount_LOCKTYPE_t: Introduce
PREEMPT_RT support
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 03:07:09AM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> +/*
> + * Automatically disable preemption for seqcount_LOCKTYPE_t writers, if the
> + * associated lock does not implicitly disable preemption.
> + *
> + * Don't do it for PREEMPT_RT. Check __SEQ_LOCK().
> + */
> +#define __seq_enforce_preemption_protection(s) \
> + (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && __seqcount_lock_preemptible(s))
Hurph, so basically you want to make __seqcount_lock_preemptible()
return true PREEMPT_RT ? Should we then not muck about with the propery
instead of this?
ISTR I had something like the below, would that not be the same but much
clearer ?
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 300cbf312546..3b5ad026ddfb 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -211,11 +211,13 @@ static inline void __seqcount_assert(seqcount_t *s)
lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
}
-SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(raw_spinlock_t, raw_spinlock, false, s->lock)
-SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(spinlock_t, spinlock, false, s->lock)
-SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(rwlock_t, rwlock, false, s->lock)
-SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct mutex, mutex, true, s->lock)
-SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct ww_mutex, ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base)
+#define __PREEMPT_RT IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
+
+SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(raw_spinlock_t, raw_spinlock, false, s->lock)
+SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(spinlock_t, spinlock, __PREEMPT_RT, s->lock)
+SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(rwlock_t, rwlock, __PREEMPT_RT, s->lock)
+SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct mutex, mutex, true, s->lock)
+SEQCOUNT_LOCKTYPE(struct ww_mutex, ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base)
/*
* SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t
Powered by blists - more mailing lists