[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200828121944.GQ1152540@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:19:44 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"Jon Derrick" <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
"Dimitri Sivanich" <sivanich@....com>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Megha Dey" <megha.dey@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 34/46] PCI/MSI: Make arch_.*_msi_irq[s] fallbacks
selectable
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:21:42PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 01:20:40PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > And I can't figure out what's special about tegra, rcar, and xilinx
> > that makes them need it as well. Is there something I could grep for
> > to identify them? Is there a way to convert them so they don't need
> > it?
>
> I think DT binding and related firmware support are needed to setup the
> MSI IRQ domains correctly, there is nothing special about tegra, rcar
> and xilinx AFAIK (well, all native host controllers MSI handling is
> *special* just to be polite but let's gloss over this for the time
> being).
>
> struct msi_controller, to answer the first question.
>
> I have doubts about pci_mvebu too, they do allocate an msi_controller
> but without methods so it looks pretty much useless.
Oh, I did once know things about mvebu..
I suspect the msi controller pointer assignment is dead code at this
point. The only implementation of MSI with that PCI root port is
drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c which looks like it uses
irq_domain.
Actually looks like things are very close to eliminating
msi_controller.
This is dead code, can't find a setter for hw_pci->msi_ctrl:
arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h: struct msi_controller *msi_ctrl;
arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c: bridge->msi = hw->msi_ctrl;
This is probably just copying NULL from one place to another:
drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c: struct msi_controller *msi;
These need conversion to irq_domain (right?):
drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c: struct msi_controller msi_chip;
drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c: struct msi_controller chip;
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c: struct msi_controller chip;
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c:static struct msi_controller xilinx_pcie_msi_chip = {
Then the stuff in drivers/pci/msi.c can go away.
So the arch_setup_msi_irq/etc is not really an arch hook, but some
infrastructure to support those 4 PCI root port drivers.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists