linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/17] virt: acrn: Introduce ACRN HSM basic driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58093008-3072-f9df-5245-f74a82906e47@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Aug 2020 09:12:22 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Shuo A Liu <shuo.a.liu@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Yu Wang <yu1.wang@...el.com>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] virt: acrn: Introduce ACRN HSM basic driver

On 8/29/20 3:46 AM, Shuo A Liu wrote:
> On Fri 28.Aug'20 at 12:25:59 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:45:05AM +0800, shuo.a.liu@...el.com wrote:
>>> +static long acrn_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
>>> +               unsigned long ioctl_param)
>>> +{
>>> +    if (cmd == ACRN_IOCTL_GET_API_VERSION) {
>>> +        if (copy_to_user((void __user *)ioctl_param,
>>> +                 &api_version, sizeof(api_version)))
>>> +            return -EFAULT;
>>
>> Why are you versioning your api?  Shouldn't that not be a thing and you
>> either support an ioctl or you do not?
> 
> The API version here is more for the hypercalls.
> The hypercalls might evolve later

They might evolve, but the old ones must always keep working.  Right?

> and the version indicates which set of interfaces (include the
> paramters' format) should be used by user space tools. Currently,
> it's used rarely.
Why do you need this when the core kernel doesn't?  We add syscalls,
ioctl()s and prctl()s all the time, but nothing is versioned.

This sounds like something you need to remove from the series.