[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200829162524.GC29091@zn.tnic>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 18:25:24 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, hpa@...or.com,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Cfir Cohen <cfir@...gle.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mike Stunes <mstunes@...are.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Martin Radev <martin.b.radev@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 39/76] x86/sev-es: Add SEV-ES Feature Detection
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:54:34AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> +/* Needs to be called from non-instrumentable code */
> +bool noinstr sev_es_active(void)
> +{
> + return !!(sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED);
You don't need the "!!" since you're returning bool.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists