[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7dcb9b4-4093-d0a3-5277-b50e212a5700@linux.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:13:27 +0300
From: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] coccinelle: misc: add uninitialized_var.cocci script
On 8/29/20 10:48 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 21:36 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Denis Efremov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Commit 63a0895d960a ("compiler: Remove uninitialized_var() macro") and
>>>> commit 4b19bec97c88 ("docs: deprecated.rst: Add uninitialized_var()")
>>>> removed uninitialized_var() and deprecated it.
>>>>
>>>> The purpose of this script is to prevent new occurrences of open-coded
>>>> variants of uninitialized_var().
>>
>>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>>> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
>>>
>>> Applied, without the commented out part.
>>>
>>> I only got three warnings, though. Perhaps the others have been fixed?
>>
>> uninitialized_var does not exist in -next
Yes, and this rule checks for not introducing these initializations once again.
i.e, checks for:
int a = a;
int a = *(&a);
>
> OK, if it seems better, I can remove it. Out of the threee reported, one
> was a completely unnecessary initialization.
>
I would like send v2 with better description and link to the documentation because it's
now available online:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#uninitialized-var
Thanks,
Denis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists