lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:26:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To:     Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
cc:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] coccinelle: misc: add uninitialized_var.cocci
 script



On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Denis Efremov wrote:

>
>
> On 8/29/20 10:48 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 21:36 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Denis Efremov wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Commit 63a0895d960a ("compiler: Remove uninitialized_var() macro") and
> >>>> commit 4b19bec97c88 ("docs: deprecated.rst: Add uninitialized_var()")
> >>>> removed uninitialized_var() and deprecated it.
> >>>>
> >>>> The purpose of this script is to prevent new occurrences of open-coded
> >>>> variants of uninitialized_var().
> >>
> >>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> >>>> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
> >>>
> >>> Applied, without the commented out part.
> >>>
> >>> I only got three warnings, though.  Perhaps the others have been fixed?
> >>
> >> uninitialized_var does not exist in -next
>
> Yes, and this rule checks for not introducing these initializations once again.
>
> i.e, checks for:
>
> int a = a;
>
> int a = *(&a);
>
> >
> > OK, if it seems better, I can remove it.  Out of the threee reported, one
> > was a completely unnecessary initialization.
> >
>
> I would like send v2 with better description and link to the documentation because it's
> now available online:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#uninitialized-var

OK, thanks.

julia

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ