[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200829073049.GC2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 09:30:49 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com,
x86@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, rostedt@...dmis.org,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, cameron@...dycamel.com,
oleg@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/23] sched: Fix try_invoke_on_locked_down_task()
semantics
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 11:01:55AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 21:29:55 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> In the next version I will drop this since I will merge the kretprobe_holder
> things into removing kretporbe hash patch.
>
> However, this patch itself seems fixing a bug of commit 2beaf3280e57
> ("sched/core: Add function to sample state of locked-down task").
> Peter, could you push this separately?
Yeah, Paul and me have a slightly different version for that, this also
changes semantics we're still bickering over ;-)
But yes, I'll take care of it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists