[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BY5PR04MB6705177184FC1A0E5F7710FDFC530@BY5PR04MB6705.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 07:32:05 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: "Bao D. Nguyen" <nguyenb@...eaurora.org>,
"cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Nitin Rawat <nitirawa@...eaurora.org>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufshcd: Allow zero value setting to
Auto-Hibernate Timer
>
> The zero value Auto-Hibernate Timer is a valid setting, and it
> indicates the Auto-Hibernate feature being disabled. Correctly
Right. So " ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable" is no longer an appropriate name.
Maybe ufshcd_auto_hibern8_set instead?
Also, did you verified that no other platform relies on its non-zero value?
Thanks,
Avri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists