linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: Use proper format in call to dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200901035722.9324-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:57:22 +0800
From:   YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To:     <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: Use proper format in call to dev_err()

The correct format string for a size_t argument should be %zu.

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c
index 66a0b296e06f..34c690da09e3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
 
 	if (bc > SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES) {
 		dev_err(&ctrl->dev,
-			"spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%ld requested\n",
+			"spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%zu requested\n",
 			SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES, bc);
 		return  -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&spmi_controller->lock, flags);
 	if (rc)
 		dev_err(&ctrl->dev,
-			"spmi read wait timeout op:0x%x slave_id:%d slave_addr:0x%x bc:%ld\n",
+			"spmi read wait timeout op:0x%x slave_id:%d slave_addr:0x%x bc:%zu\n",
 			opc, slave_id, slave_addr, bc + 1);
 	else
 		dev_dbg(&ctrl->dev, "%s: id:%d slave_addr:0x%x, read value: %*ph\n",
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
 
 	if (bc > SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES) {
 		dev_err(&ctrl->dev,
-			"spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%ld requested\n",
+			"spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%zu requested\n",
 			SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES, bc);
 		return  -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&spmi_controller->lock, flags);
 
 	if (rc)
-		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "spmi write wait timeout op:0x%x slave_id:%d slave_addr:0x%x bc:%ld\n",
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "spmi write wait timeout op:0x%x slave_id:%d slave_addr:0x%x bc:%zu\n",
 			opc, slave_id, slave_addr, bc);
 	else
 		dev_dbg(&ctrl->dev, "%s: id:%d slave_addr:0x%x, wrote value: %*ph\n",
-- 
2.17.1