linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: Use proper format in call to dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200901082728.5ce6eda1@coco.lan>
Date:   Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:27:28 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: Use proper
 format in call to dev_err()

Em Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:57:22 +0800
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> escreveu:

> The correct format string for a size_t argument should be %zu.
> 
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c
> index 66a0b296e06f..34c690da09e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hisi-spmi-controller.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
>  
>  	if (bc > SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES) {
>  		dev_err(&ctrl->dev,
> -			"spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%ld requested\n",
> +			"spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%zu requested\n",
>  			SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES, bc);
>  		return  -EINVAL;
>  	}
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&spmi_controller->lock, flags);
>  	if (rc)
>  		dev_err(&ctrl->dev,
> -			"spmi read wait timeout op:0x%x slave_id:%d slave_addr:0x%x bc:%ld\n",
> +			"spmi read wait timeout op:0x%x slave_id:%d slave_addr:0x%x bc:%zu\n",
>  			opc, slave_id, slave_addr, bc + 1);
>  	else
>  		dev_dbg(&ctrl->dev, "%s: id:%d slave_addr:0x%x, read value: %*ph\n",
> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
>  
>  	if (bc > SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES) {
>  		dev_err(&ctrl->dev,
> -			"spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%ld requested\n",
> +			"spmi_controller supports 1..%d bytes per trans, but:%zu requested\n",
>  			SPMI_CONTROLLER_MAX_TRANS_BYTES, bc);
>  		return  -EINVAL;
>  	}
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&spmi_controller->lock, flags);
>  
>  	if (rc)
> -		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "spmi write wait timeout op:0x%x slave_id:%d slave_addr:0x%x bc:%ld\n",
> +		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "spmi write wait timeout op:0x%x slave_id:%d slave_addr:0x%x bc:%zu\n",
>  			opc, slave_id, slave_addr, bc);
>  	else
>  		dev_dbg(&ctrl->dev, "%s: id:%d slave_addr:0x%x, wrote value: %*ph\n",



Thanks,
Mauro