[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200901152728.GI16650@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:27:28 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Dirk Kostrewa <dirk.kostrewa@...lbox.org>
Subject: Re: kworker/0:3+pm hogging CPU
On Mon 31-08-20 14:37:10, Mathias Nyman wrote:
[...]
> I can't come up with any good solution to this right now.
> Only bad ideas such as
> a. Add a sleep to the over-current case,
> doesn't solve anything else than the ~100% cpu hogging part of the problem
This sounds like a better thing from the user space point of view. I do
not have any insight on what kind of other side effects this might have
so I didn't dare to try that on my piece of (broken) HW. I do not see
the problem all the time and I plan to replace it soon anyway.
Considering that tweaking the power management helps maybe that could be
done automagically after many consecutive failures.
Just my 2c
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists