[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f723f5a7-1b2e-e8d1-3b0b-201069b7a40c@mailbox.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:57:16 +0200
From: Dirk Kostrewa <dirk.kostrewa@...lbox.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: kworker/0:3+pm hogging CPU
Hi,
meanwhile, I convinced Dell that I have a hardware issue (and not a
Linux issue), and Dell has replaced the mainboard of my laptop. After
that, both the USB over-current kernel messages and the kworker
processes with permanent high CPU load are gone. So, this was indeed a
hardware issue!
Many thanks for your feedback and help!
Best regards,
Dirk.
Am 01.09.20 um 17:27 schrieb Michal Hocko:
> On Mon 31-08-20 14:37:10, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> [...]
>> I can't come up with any good solution to this right now.
>> Only bad ideas such as
>> a. Add a sleep to the over-current case,
>> doesn't solve anything else than the ~100% cpu hogging part of the problem
> This sounds like a better thing from the user space point of view. I do
> not have any insight on what kind of other side effects this might have
> so I didn't dare to try that on my piece of (broken) HW. I do not see
> the problem all the time and I plan to replace it soon anyway.
>
> Considering that tweaking the power management helps maybe that could be
> done automagically after many consecutive failures.
>
> Just my 2c
Powered by blists - more mailing lists