[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVNy+qKeSytvDduCuH3HV02mB7i88P27Ou+h=PC22hqwHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:10:05 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
syzbot <syzbot+61acc40a49a3e46e25ea@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>, paulmck@...nel.org
Subject: Re: splice: infinite busy loop lockup bug
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:53 AM Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 09:34:08PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > On 2020/08/07 21:27, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 07:35:08PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > >> syzbot is reporting hung task at pipe_release() [1], for for_each_bvec() from
> > >> iterate_bvec() from iterate_all_kinds() from iov_iter_alignment() from
> > >> ext4_unaligned_io() from ext4_dio_write_iter() from ext4_file_write_iter() from
> > >> call_write_iter() from do_iter_readv_writev() from do_iter_write() from
> > >> vfs_iter_write() from iter_file_splice_write() falls into infinite busy loop
> > >> with pipe->mutex held.
> > >>
> > >> The reason of falling into infinite busy loop is that iter_file_splice_write()
> > >> for some reason generates "struct bio_vec" entry with .bv_len=0 and .bv_offset=0
> > >> while for_each_bvec() cannot handle .bv_len == 0.
> > >
> > > broken in 1bdc76aea115 "iov_iter: use bvec iterator to implement iterate_bvec()",
> > > unless I'm misreading it...
>
> I have been chasing something similar for a while as in,
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/89F418A9-EB20-48CB-9AE0-52C700E6BB74@lca.pw/
>
> In my case, it seems the endless loop happens in iterate_iovec() instead where
> I put a debug patch here,
>
> --- a/lib/iov_iter.c
> +++ b/lib/iov_iter.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> if (unlikely(!__v.iov_len)) \
> continue; \
> __v.iov_base = __p->iov_base; \
> + printk_ratelimited("ITER_IOVEC left = %zu, n = %zu\n", left, n); \
> left = (STEP); \
> __v.iov_len -= left; \
> skip = __v.iov_len; \
>
> and end up seeing overflows ("n" supposes to be less than PAGE_SIZE) before the
> soft-lockups and a dead system,
>
> [ 4300.249180][T470195] ITER_IOVEC left = 0, n = 48566423
>
> Thoughts?
Does the following patch make a difference for you?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20200817100055.2495905-1-ming.lei@redhat.com/
thanks,
Ming Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists