lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200901011714.GF16155@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Sep 2020 04:17:14 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Adam Goode <agoode@...gle.com>
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: uvcvideo: Convey full ycbcr colorspace
 information to v4l2

Hi Adam,

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:31:54PM -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:38 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On 24/08/2020 15:56, Adam Goode wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:48 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > >> On 23/08/2020 17:08, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 05:54:24PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >>>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 09:21:34PM -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
> > >>>>> The Color Matching Descriptor has been present in USB cameras since
> > >>>>> the original version of UVC, but it has never been fully used
> > >>>>> in Linux.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This change informs V4L2 of all of the critical colorspace parameters:
> > >>>>> colorspace (called "color primaries" in UVC), transfer function
> > >>>>> (called "transfer characteristics" in UVC), ycbcr encoding (called
> > >>>>> "matrix coefficients" in UVC), and quantization, which is always
> > >>>>> LIMITED for UVC, see section 2.26 in USB_Video_FAQ_1.5.pdf.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Isn't this valid for MJPEG only though ? There's not much else we can do
> > >>>> though, as UVC cameras don't report quantization information. Shouldn't
> > >>>> we however reflect this in the commit message, and in the comment below,
> > >>>> to state that UVC requires limited quantization range for MJPEG, and
> > >>>> while it doesn't explicitly specify the quantization range for other
> > >>>> formats, we can only assume it should be limited as well ?
> > >
> > > Yes, I am happy to improve the comment to be clearer.
> > >
> > >>>> The code otherwise looks good to me.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please let me know if you'd like to address the above issue.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> The quantization is the most important improvement for this patch,
> > >>>>> because V4L2 will otherwise interpret MJPEG as FULL range. Web browsers
> > >>>>> such as Chrome and Firefox already ignore V4L2's quantization for USB
> > >>>>> devices and use the correct LIMITED value, but other programs such
> > >>>>> as qv4l2 will incorrectly interpret the output of MJPEG from USB
> > >>>>> cameras without this change.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Adam Goode <agoode@...gle.com>
> > >>>>> ---
> > >>>>>  drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >>>>>  drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c   |  6 ++++
> > >>>>>  drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h   |  5 ++-
> > >>>>>  3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> > >>>>> index 431d86e1c94b..c0c81b089b7d 100644
> > >>>>> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> > >>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
> > >>>>> @@ -248,10 +248,10 @@ static struct uvc_format_desc *uvc_format_by_guid(const u8 guid[16])
> > >>>>>     return NULL;
> > >>>>>  }
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -static u32 uvc_colorspace(const u8 primaries)
> > >>>>> +static enum v4l2_colorspace uvc_colorspace(const u8 primaries)
> > >>>>>  {
> > >>>>> -   static const u8 colorprimaries[] = {
> > >>>>> -           0,
> > >>>>> +   static const enum v4l2_colorspace colorprimaries[] = {
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_COLORSPACE_DEFAULT,  /* Unspecified */
> > >>>>>             V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB,
> > >>>>>             V4L2_COLORSPACE_470_SYSTEM_M,
> > >>>>>             V4L2_COLORSPACE_470_SYSTEM_BG,
> > >>>>> @@ -262,7 +262,43 @@ static u32 uvc_colorspace(const u8 primaries)
> > >>>>>     if (primaries < ARRAY_SIZE(colorprimaries))
> > >>>>>             return colorprimaries[primaries];
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -   return 0;
> > >>>>> +   return V4L2_COLORSPACE_DEFAULT;  /* Reserved */
> > >>>>> +}
> > >>>>> +
> > >>>>> +static enum v4l2_xfer_func uvc_xfer_func(const u8 transfer_characteristics)
> > >>>>> +{
> > >>>>> +   static const enum v4l2_xfer_func xfer_funcs[] = {
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_XFER_FUNC_DEFAULT,  /* Unspecified */
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_XFER_FUNC_709,
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_XFER_FUNC_709,      /* BT.470-2 M */
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_XFER_FUNC_709,      /* BT.470-2 B, G */
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_XFER_FUNC_709,      /* SMPTE 170M */
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_XFER_FUNC_SMPTE240M,
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_XFER_FUNC_NONE,     /* Linear (V = Lc) */
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_XFER_FUNC_SRGB,
> > >>>>> +   };
> > >>>>> +
> > >>>>> +   if (transfer_characteristics < ARRAY_SIZE(xfer_funcs))
> > >>>>> +           return xfer_funcs[transfer_characteristics];
> > >>>>> +
> > >>>>> +   return V4L2_XFER_FUNC_DEFAULT;  /* Reserved */
> > >>>>> +}
> > >>>>> +
> > >>>>> +static enum v4l2_ycbcr_encoding uvc_ycbcr_enc(const u8 matrix_coefficients)
> > >>>>> +{
> > >>>>> +   static const enum v4l2_ycbcr_encoding ycbcr_encs[] = {
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_DEFAULT,  /* Unspecified */
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_709,
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_601,      /* FCC */
> > >>>
> > >>> I may have spoken a bit too fast. Doesn't FCC differ from BT.601 ?
> > >>> According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AYCbCr, the former uses
> > >>>
> > >>>  E'Y = 0.59 E'G + 0.11 E'B + 0.30 E'R
> > >>>  E'PB = – 0.331 E'G + 0.500 E'B – 0.169 E'R
> > >>>  E'PR = – 0.421 E'G – 0.079 E'B + 0.500 E'R
> > >>>
> > >>> while the latter uses
> > >>>
> > >>>  E'Y = 0.587 E'G + 0.114 E'B + 0.299 E'R
> > >>>  E'PB = – 0.331 E'G + 0.500 E'B – 0.169 E'R
> > >>>  E'PR = – 0.419 E'G – 0.081 E'B + 0.500 E'R
> > >>>
> > >>> We seems to be missing FCC in the V4L2 color space definitions.
> > >>
> > >> The differences between the two are minuscule. Add to that that NTSC 1953
> > >> hasn't been in use for many decades. So I have no plans to add another YCC
> > >> encoding for this. I'll double check this in a few weeks time when I have
> > >> access to a better book on colorimetry.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I can add a comment directly to clarify, but I am following the
> > > mappings described in videodev2.h (with the assumption that "FCC" is
> > > close enough to 601):
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Mapping of V4L2_XFER_FUNC_DEFAULT to actual transfer functions
> > > * for the various colorspaces:
> > > *
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_SMPTE170M, V4L2_COLORSPACE_470_SYSTEM_M,
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_470_SYSTEM_BG, V4L2_COLORSPACE_REC709 and
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_BT2020: V4L2_XFER_FUNC_709
> > > *
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB, V4L2_COLORSPACE_JPEG: V4L2_XFER_FUNC_SRGB
> > > *
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_OPRGB: V4L2_XFER_FUNC_OPRGB
> > > *
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_SMPTE240M: V4L2_XFER_FUNC_SMPTE240M
> > > *
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_RAW: V4L2_XFER_FUNC_NONE
> > > *
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_DCI_P3: V4L2_XFER_FUNC_DCI_P3
> > > */
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Mapping of V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_DEFAULT to actual encodings for the
> > > * various colorspaces:
> > > *
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_SMPTE170M, V4L2_COLORSPACE_470_SYSTEM_M,
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_470_SYSTEM_BG, V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB,
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_OPRGB and V4L2_COLORSPACE_JPEG: V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_601
> > > *
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_REC709 and V4L2_COLORSPACE_DCI_P3: V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_709
> > > *
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_BT2020: V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_BT2020
> > > *
> > > * V4L2_COLORSPACE_SMPTE240M: V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_SMPTE240M
> > > */
> > >
> > > We could potentially do with some more xfer functions, though.
> > >
> > >>>
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_601,      /* BT.470-2 B, G */
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_601,      /* SMPTE 170M */
> > >>>>> +           V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_SMPTE240M,
> > >>>>> +   };
> > >>>>> +
> > >>>>> +   if (matrix_coefficients < ARRAY_SIZE(ycbcr_encs))
> > >>>>> +           return ycbcr_encs[matrix_coefficients];
> > >>>>> +
> > >>>>> +   return V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_DEFAULT;  /* Reserved */
> > >>>>>  }
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>  /* Simplify a fraction using a simple continued fraction decomposition. The
> > >>>>> @@ -704,6 +740,14 @@ static int uvc_parse_format(struct uvc_device *dev,
> > >>>>>             }
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>             format->colorspace = uvc_colorspace(buffer[3]);
> > >>>>> +           format->xfer_func = uvc_xfer_func(buffer[4]);
> > >>>>> +           format->ycbcr_enc = uvc_ycbcr_enc(buffer[5]);
> > >>>>> +           /* All USB YCbCr encodings use LIMITED range as of UVC 1.5.
> > >>>>> +            * This is true even for MJPEG, which V4L2 otherwise assumes to
> > >>>>> +            * be FULL.
> > >>>>> +            * See section 2.26 in USB_Video_FAQ_1.5.pdf.
> > >>
> > >> Not true. I checked the FAQ: the FAQ describes what happens when a video renderer
> > >> incorrectly interprets the decoded JPEG color components as limited range instead
> > >> of full range (which they are to be JPEG compliant). JPEG always encodes YCbCr as
> > >> full range.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Here is what the FAQ says:
> > >
> > > "If the images are encoded with the luma and chroma units in the 0-255
> > > range that is used
> > > for typical JPEG still images, then the saturation and contrast will
> > > look artificially boosted
> > > when the video is rendered under the assumption that the levels were
> > > in the YCbCr color
> > > space. BT601 specifies eight-bit coding where Y is in the range of 16
> > > (black) to 235 (white)
> > > inclusive."
> > >
> > > I read this as saying "if you encode MJPEG the same as typical JPEG
> > > still images, it is wrong because Y must be in the range 16-235". Am I
> > > reading this incorrectly?
> >
> > I think so. It's the 'when the video is rendered under the assumption that
> > the levels were in the YCbCr color space.' that is the reason why the colors
> > are boosted. Normally a JPEG is either decoded to full range RGB or limited
> > range YCbCr. If it is decoded to full range YCbCr, then the renderer should
> > take that into account, otherwise the colors will be wrong ('boosted').
> >
> > The text is a bit ambiguous, but JPEG always uses full range YCbCr, that's
> > just part of the JPEG standard.
> 
> Hmm. The text is definitely confusing. Here are some facts I know:
> 
> About JPEG and JFIF:
> - JPEG itself doesn't mandate the YCbCr encoding (this is specified in
> JFIF). [https://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/jfif3.pdf]
> - JFIF specifies YCbCr encoding and range as 601 but with an explicit
> change: "Y, Cb, and Cr are converted from R, G, and B as defined in
> CCIR Recommendation 601 but are normalized so as to occupy the full
> 256 levels of a 8-bit binary encoding".
> - A JPEG file isn't JFIF unless it has an APP0 with 'JFIF'.
> 
> About MJPEG:
> - MJPEG doesn't specify explicit YCbCr encoding information (there
> isn't really a specification?).
> - The USB devices I have that output MJPEG do not output JFIF (no APP0
> with 'JFIF').
> 
> About color in UVC:
> - MJPEG in UVC is required to be 8-bit YCbCr encoded
> [USB_Video_Payload_MJPEG_1.5.pdf, section 3.3] with the color encoding
> information specified via the Color Matching descriptor
> [USB_Video_Payload_MJPEG_1.5.pdf, section 3].
> - The UVC Color Matching descriptor cites BT.601 and other standards
> without mentioning any changes to them [UVC Class Specification
> 1.5.pdf, 3.9.2.6].
> - BT.601 and BT.709 require limited-range YCbCr encoding.
> 
> Real-world observations:
> - The USB webcams I have (Logitech) output limited-range UVC MJPEG.

How have you determined that ? I'd like to run tests locally, and before
writing an application that decompresses JPEG without any colorspace
conversion, I'd like to know if one already exists.

> - The ATEM Mini outputs full-range UVC MJPEG, but this is considered
> to be incorrect behavior
> (https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=108315,
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEXQ5s2HpwE).
> - Chrome, Firefox, and Safari interpret UVC MJPEG as limited-range.
> 
> 
> I would agree that if the MJPEG coming out of UVC has JFIF headers, we
> would have a problem, because we would have conflicting YCbCr encoding
> metadata.
> 
> But since:
> 1. UVC is pretty clear about how to encode color,
> 2. JPEG-without-JFIF doesn't define YCbCr encoding,
> 3. MJPEG devices output non-JFIF JPEG,
> 4. UVC only specifies limited-range encoding for YCbCr,
> 
> I would conclude that UVC MJPEG should be expected to be limited-range.
>
> > >>>>> +            */
> > >>>>> +           format->quantization = V4L2_QUANTIZATION_LIM_RANGE;
> > >>
> > >> What about sRGB? That uses full range.
> > >>
> > >
> > > It is a little confusing in the code, but I only set the quantization
> > > explicitly when we get a Color Matching descriptor from the device. My
> > > reading of the spec says that this descriptor isn't present for RGB
> > > formats, only YCrCb. When the spec mentions sRGB in Color Matching, it
> > > is referring only to primaries or gamma.
> > >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>             buflen -= buffer[0];
> > >>>>>             buffer += buffer[0];
> > >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > >>>>> index 7f14096cb44d..79daf46b3dcd 100644
> > >>>>> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > >>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > >>>>> @@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ static int uvc_v4l2_try_format(struct uvc_streaming *stream,
> > >>>>>     fmt->fmt.pix.sizeimage = probe->dwMaxVideoFrameSize;
> > >>>>>     fmt->fmt.pix.pixelformat = format->fcc;
> > >>>>>     fmt->fmt.pix.colorspace = format->colorspace;
> > >>>>> +   fmt->fmt.pix.xfer_func = format->xfer_func;
> > >>>>> +   fmt->fmt.pix.ycbcr_enc = format->ycbcr_enc;
> > >>>>> +   fmt->fmt.pix.quantization = format->quantization;
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>     if (uvc_format != NULL)
> > >>>>>             *uvc_format = format;
> > >>>>> @@ -315,6 +318,9 @@ static int uvc_v4l2_get_format(struct uvc_streaming *stream,
> > >>>>>     fmt->fmt.pix.bytesperline = uvc_v4l2_get_bytesperline(format, frame);
> > >>>>>     fmt->fmt.pix.sizeimage = stream->ctrl.dwMaxVideoFrameSize;
> > >>>>>     fmt->fmt.pix.colorspace = format->colorspace;
> > >>>>> +   fmt->fmt.pix.xfer_func = format->xfer_func;
> > >>>>> +   fmt->fmt.pix.ycbcr_enc = format->ycbcr_enc;
> > >>>>> +   fmt->fmt.pix.quantization = format->quantization;
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>  done:
> > >>>>>     mutex_unlock(&stream->mutex);
> > >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > >>>>> index 6ab972c643e3..6508192173dd 100644
> > >>>>> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > >>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > >>>>> @@ -370,7 +370,10 @@ struct uvc_format {
> > >>>>>     u8 type;
> > >>>>>     u8 index;
> > >>>>>     u8 bpp;
> > >>>>> -   u8 colorspace;
> > >>>>> +   enum v4l2_colorspace colorspace;
> > >>>>> +   enum v4l2_xfer_func xfer_func;
> > >>>>> +   enum v4l2_ycbcr_encoding ycbcr_enc;
> > >>>>> +   enum v4l2_quantization quantization;
> > >>>>>     u32 fcc;
> > >>>>>     u32 flags;
> > >>>>>

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ