linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Fix return value check in k3_dsp_rproc_of_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200902165904.GB280378@xps15>
Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:59:04 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     ohad@...ery.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, s-anna@...com,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Fix return value check in
 k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories()

On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 10:06:14PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> In case of error, the function devm_ioremap_wc() returns NULL pointer
> not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check should be
> replaced with NULL test.
> 
> Fixes: 87218f96c21a ("remoteproc: k3-dsp: Add support for C71x DSPs")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> index 9011e477290c..f373df35d7d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> @@ -445,10 +445,10 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  
>  		kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res->start,
>  							 resource_size(res));
> -		if (IS_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr)) {
> +		if (!kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr) {
>  			dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n",
>  				data->mems[i].name);
> -			return PTR_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr);
> +			return -EBUSY;

Shouldn't this be -ENOMEM?

>  		}
>  		kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start;
>  		kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
>