[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70ad695c-4200-7927-7274-dc4d5bd32920@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:44:51 -0500
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
CC: <ohad@...ery.com>, <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Fix return value check in
k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories()
On 9/2/20 11:59 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 10:06:14PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
>> In case of error, the function devm_ioremap_wc() returns NULL pointer
>> not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check should be
>> replaced with NULL test.
>>
>> Fixes: 87218f96c21a ("remoteproc: k3-dsp: Add support for C71x DSPs")
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
>> index 9011e477290c..f373df35d7d0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -445,10 +445,10 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>
>> kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res->start,
>> resource_size(res));
>> - if (IS_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr)) {
>> + if (!kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr) {
>> dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n",
>> data->mems[i].name);
>> - return PTR_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr);
>> + return -EBUSY;
>
> Shouldn't this be -ENOMEM?
Indeed, thanks for catching it.
I will fix these same issues on the K3 R5F driver for v4.
regards
Suman
>
>> }
>> kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start;
>> kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr;
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists