Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:58:19 -0700
From:   Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/doc: editorial pass on page migration


On 9/2/20 12:41 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hey Ralph,
> 
> Thanks for the update/corrections. Nice job.
> 
> A few nits/comments below:
> 
> On 9/2/20 12:06 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
>> Add Sphinx reference links to HMM and CPUSETS, and numerous small
>> editorial changes to make the page_migration.rst document more readable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
>> ---
>>   .../admin-guide/cgroup-v1/cpusets.rst         |   2 +
>>   Documentation/vm/hmm.rst                      |   2 +-
>>   Documentation/vm/page_migration.rst           | 150 +++++++++---------
>>   3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>>
> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/vm/page_migration.rst b/Documentation/vm/page_migration.rst
>> index 68883ac485fa..bde21cd2f21f 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/vm/page_migration.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/vm/page_migration.rst
>> @@ -4,25 +4,28 @@
>>   Page migration
>>   ==============
>>   
>> -Page migration allows the moving of the physical location of pages between
>> -nodes in a numa system while the process is running. This means that the
>> +Page migration allows moving the physical location of pages between
>> +nodes in a NUMA system while the process is running. This means that the
>>   virtual addresses that the process sees do not change. However, the
>>   system rearranges the physical location of those pages.
>>   
>> -The main intend of page migration is to reduce the latency of memory access
>> +Also see :ref:`Heterogeneous Memory Management (HMM) <hmm>`
>> +for migrating pages to or from device private memory.
>> +
>> +The main intent of page migration is to reduce the latency of memory accesses
>>   by moving pages near to the processor where the process accessing that memory
>>   is running.
>>   
>>   Page migration allows a process to manually relocate the node on which its
>>   pages are located through the MF_MOVE and MF_MOVE_ALL options while setting
>> -a new memory policy via mbind(). The pages of process can also be relocated
>> +a new memory policy via mbind(). The pages of a process can also be relocated
>>   from another process using the sys_migrate_pages() function call. The
>> -migrate_pages function call takes two sets of nodes and moves pages of a
>> +migrate_pages() function call takes two sets of nodes and moves pages of a
>>   process that are located on the from nodes to the destination nodes.
>>   Page migration functions are provided by the numactl package by Andi Kleen
>>   (a version later than 0.9.3 is required. Get it from
>>   ftp://oss.sgi.com/www/projects/libnuma/download/). numactl provides libnuma
> 
>     URL not valid/working AFAICT.

I'll update it to https://github.com/numactl/numactl.git

>> -which provides an interface similar to other numa functionality for page
>> +which provides an interface similar to other NUMA functionality for page
>>   migration.  cat ``/proc/<pid>/numa_maps`` allows an easy review of where the
>>   pages of a process are located. See also the numa_maps documentation in the
>>   proc(5) man page.
>> @@ -30,19 +33,19 @@ proc(5) man page.
>>   Manual migration is useful if for example the scheduler has relocated
>>   a process to a processor on a distant node. A batch scheduler or an
>>   administrator may detect the situation and move the pages of the process
>> -nearer to the new processor. The kernel itself does only provide
>> +nearer to the new processor. The kernel itself only provides
>>   manual page migration support. Automatic page migration may be implemented
>>   through user space processes that move pages. A special function call
>>   "move_pages" allows the moving of individual pages within a process.
>> -A NUMA profiler may f.e. obtain a log showing frequent off node
>> +For example, A NUMA profiler may obtain a log showing frequent off node
> 
> nit only:                                                         off-node

OK

>>   accesses and may use the result to move pages to more advantageous
>>   locations.
>>   
>>   Larger installations usually partition the system using cpusets into
>>   sections of nodes. Paul Jackson has equipped cpusets with the ability to
>>   move pages when a task is moved to another cpuset (See
>> -Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/cpusets.rst).
>> -Cpusets allows the automation of process locality. If a task is moved to
>> +:ref:`CPUSETS <cpusets>`).
>> +Cpusets allow the automation of process locality. If a task is moved to
>>   a new cpuset then also all its pages are moved with it so that the
>>   performance of the process does not sink dramatically. Also the pages
>>   of processes in a cpuset are moved if the allowed memory nodes of a
>> @@ -67,9 +70,9 @@ In kernel use of migrate_pages()
>>      Lists of pages to be migrated are generated by scanning over
>>      pages and moving them into lists. This is done by
>>      calling isolate_lru_page().
>> -   Calling isolate_lru_page increases the references to the page
>> +   Calling isolate_lru_page() increases the references to the page
>>      so that it cannot vanish while the page migration occurs.
>> -   It also prevents the swapper or other scans to encounter
>> +   It also prevents the swapper or other scans from encountering
>>      the page.
>>   
>>   2. We need to have a function of type new_page_t that can be
>> @@ -91,23 +94,24 @@ is increased so that the page cannot be freed while page migration occurs.
>>   
>>   Steps:
>>   
>> -1. Lock the page to be migrated
>> +1. Lock the page to be migrated.
>>   
>>   2. Ensure that writeback is complete.
>>   
>>   3. Lock the new page that we want to move to. It is locked so that accesses to
>> -   this (not yet uptodate) page immediately lock while the move is in progress.
>> +   this (not yet uptodate) page immediately block while the move is in progress.
>>   
>>   4. All the page table references to the page are converted to migration
>>      entries. This decreases the mapcount of a page. If the resulting
>>      mapcount is not zero then we do not migrate the page. All user space
>> -   processes that attempt to access the page will now wait on the page lock.
>> +   processes that attempt to access the page will now wait on the page lock
>> +   or wait for the migration page table entry to be removed.
>>   
>>   5. The i_pages lock is taken. This will cause all processes trying
>>      to access the page via the mapping to block on the spinlock.
>>   
>> -6. The refcount of the page is examined and we back out if references remain
>> -   otherwise we know that we are the only one referencing this page.
>> +6. The refcount of the page is examined and we back out if references remain.
>> +   Otherwise, we know that we are the only one referencing this page.
>>   
>>   7. The radix tree is checked and if it does not contain the pointer to this
>>      page then we back out because someone else modified the radix tree.
>> @@ -134,22 +138,22 @@ Steps:
>>   
>>   15. Queued up writeback on the new page is triggered.
>>   
>> -16. If migration entries were page then replace them with real ptes. Doing
>> -    so will enable access for user space processes not already waiting for
>> -    the page lock.
>> +16. If migration entries were inserted into the page table, then replace them
>> +    with real ptes. Doing so will enable access for user space processes not
>> +    already waiting for the page lock.
>>   
>> -19. The page locks are dropped from the old and new page.
>> +17. The page locks are dropped from the old and new page.
>>       Processes waiting on the page lock will redo their page faults
>>       and will reach the new page.
>>   
>> -20. The new page is moved to the LRU and can be scanned by the swapper
>> -    etc again.
>> +18. The new page is moved to the LRU and can be scanned by the swapper,
>> +    etc. again.
>>   
>>   Non-LRU page migration
>>   ======================
>>   
>> -Although original migration aimed for reducing the latency of memory access
>> -for NUMA, compaction who want to create high-order page is also main customer.
>> +Although migration originally aimed for reducing the latency of memory accesses
>> +for NUMA, compaction also uses migration to create high-order pages.
>>   
>>   Current problem of the implementation is that it is designed to migrate only
>>   *LRU* pages. However, there are potential non-lru pages which can be migrated
>> @@ -158,46 +162,47 @@ in drivers, for example, zsmalloc, virtio-balloon pages.
>>   For virtio-balloon pages, some parts of migration code path have been hooked
>>   up and added virtio-balloon specific functions to intercept migration logics.
>>   It's too specific to a driver so other drivers who want to make their pages
>> -movable would have to add own specific hooks in migration path.
>> +movable would have to add their own specific hooks in the migration path.
>>   
>> -To overclome the problem, VM supports non-LRU page migration which provides
>> +To overcome the problem, VM supports non-LRU page migration which provides
>>   generic functions for non-LRU movable pages without driver specific hooks
>> -migration path.
>> +in the migration path.
>>   
>> -If a driver want to make own pages movable, it should define three functions
>> +If a driver wants to make its pages movable, it should define three functions
>>   which are function pointers of struct address_space_operations.
>>   
>>   1. ``bool (*isolate_page) (struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode);``
>>   
>> -   What VM expects on isolate_page function of driver is to return *true*
>> -   if driver isolates page successfully. On returing true, VM marks the page
>> +   What VM expects on isolate_page() function of driver is to return *true*
> 
> maybe                 of {or from}

from sounds good to me.

>> +   if driver isolates the page successfully. On returning true, VM marks the page
>>      as PG_isolated so concurrent isolation in several CPUs skip the page
>>      for isolation. If a driver cannot isolate the page, it should return *false*.
>>   
>>      Once page is successfully isolated, VM uses page.lru fields so driver
>> -   shouldn't expect to preserve values in that fields.
>> +   shouldn't expect to preserve values in those fields.
>>   
>>   2. ``int (*migratepage) (struct address_space *mapping,``
>>   |	``struct page *newpage, struct page *oldpage, enum migrate_mode);``
>>   
>> -   After isolation, VM calls migratepage of driver with isolated page.
>> -   The function of migratepage is to move content of the old page to new page
>> +   After isolation, VM calls migratepage() of driver with the isolated page.
>> +   The function of migratepage() is to move the contents of the old page to the
>> +   new page
>>      and set up fields of struct page newpage. Keep in mind that you should
>>      indicate to the VM the oldpage is no longer movable via __ClearPageMovable()
>> -   under page_lock if you migrated the oldpage successfully and returns
>> +   under page_lock if you migrated the oldpage successfully and returned
>>      MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS. If driver cannot migrate the page at the moment, driver
>>      can return -EAGAIN. On -EAGAIN, VM will retry page migration in a short time
>> -   because VM interprets -EAGAIN as "temporal migration failure". On returning
>> -   any error except -EAGAIN, VM will give up the page migration without retrying
>> -   in this time.
>> +   because VM interprets -EAGAIN as "temporary migration failure". On returning
>> +   any error except -EAGAIN, VM will give up the page migration without
>> +   retrying.
>>   
>> -   Driver shouldn't touch page.lru field VM using in the functions.
>> +   Driver shouldn't touch the page.lru field while in the migratepage() function.
>>   
>>   3. ``void (*putback_page)(struct page *);``
>>   
>> -   If migration fails on isolated page, VM should return the isolated page
>> -   to the driver so VM calls driver's putback_page with migration failed page.
>> -   In this function, driver should put the isolated page back to the own data
>> +   If migration fails on the isolated page, VM should return the isolated page
>> +   to the driver so VM calls the driver's putback_page() with the isolated page.
>> +   In this function, the driver should put the isolated page back into its own data
>>      structure.
>>   
>>   4. non-lru movable page flags
>> @@ -206,52 +211,51 @@ which are function pointers of struct address_space_operations.
>>   
>>      * PG_movable
>>   
>> -     Driver should use the below function to make page movable under page_lock::
>> +     Driver should use the function below to make page movable under page_lock::
>>   
>>   	void __SetPageMovable(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping)
>>   
>>        It needs argument of address_space for registering migration
>>        family functions which will be called by VM. Exactly speaking,
>> -     PG_movable is not a real flag of struct page. Rather than, VM
>> -     reuses page->mapping's lower bits to represent it.
>> +     PG_movable is not a real flag of struct page. Rather, VM
>> +     reuses the page->mapping's lower bits to represent it::
>>   
>> -::
>>   	#define PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE 0x2
>>   	page->mapping = page->mapping | PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE;
>>   
>>        so driver shouldn't access page->mapping directly. Instead, driver should
>> -     use page_mapping which mask off the low two bits of page->mapping under
>> -     page lock so it can get right struct address_space.
>> -
>> -     For testing of non-lru movable page, VM supports __PageMovable function.
>> -     However, it doesn't guarantee to identify non-lru movable page because
>> -     page->mapping field is unified with other variables in struct page.
>> -     As well, if driver releases the page after isolation by VM, page->mapping
>> -     doesn't have stable value although it has PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE
>> -     (Look at __ClearPageMovable). But __PageMovable is cheap to catch whether
>> -     page is LRU or non-lru movable once the page has been isolated. Because
>> -     LRU pages never can have PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE in page->mapping. It is also
>> +     use page_mapping() which masks off the low two bits of page->mapping under
>> +     page lock so it can get the right struct address_space.
>> +
>> +     For testing of non-lru movable pages, VM supports __PageMovable() function.
> 
>                         non-LRU

I'll globally replace non-lru with non-LRU.

>> +     However, it doesn't guarantee to identify non-lru movable pages because
> 
>                                                    non-LRU
> 
>> +     the page->mapping field is unified with other variables in struct page.
>> +     If the driver releases the page after isolation by VM, page->mapping
>> +     doesn't have a stable value although it has PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE set
>> +     (look at __ClearPageMovable). But __PageMovable() is cheap to call whether
>> +     page is LRU or non-lru movable once the page has been isolated because LRU
> 
>                         non-LRU
> 
>> +     pages can never have PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE set in page->mapping. It is also
>>        good for just peeking to test non-lru movable pages before more expensive
>> -     checking with lock_page in pfn scanning to select victim.
>> +     checking with lock_page() in pfn scanning to select a victim.
>>   
>> -     For guaranteeing non-lru movable page, VM provides PageMovable function.
>> -     Unlike __PageMovable, PageMovable functions validates page->mapping and
>> -     mapping->a_ops->isolate_page under lock_page. The lock_page prevents sudden
>> -     destroying of page->mapping.
>> +     For guaranteeing non-lru movable page, VM provides PageMovable() function.
> 
>                           non-LRU
> 
>> +     Unlike __PageMovable(), PageMovable() validates page->mapping and
>> +     mapping->a_ops->isolate_page under lock_page(). The lock_page() prevents
>> +     sudden destroying of page->mapping.
>>   
>> -     Driver using __SetPageMovable should clear the flag via __ClearMovablePage
>> -     under page_lock before the releasing the page.
>> +     Drivers using __SetPageMovable() should clear the flag via
>> +     __ClearMovablePage() under page_lock() before the releasing the page.
>>   
>>      * PG_isolated
>>   
>>        To prevent concurrent isolation among several CPUs, VM marks isolated page
>> -     as PG_isolated under lock_page. So if a CPU encounters PG_isolated non-lru
>> -     movable page, it can skip it. Driver doesn't need to manipulate the flag
>> -     because VM will set/clear it automatically. Keep in mind that if driver
>> -     sees PG_isolated page, it means the page have been isolated by VM so it
>> -     shouldn't touch page.lru field.
>> -     PG_isolated is alias with PG_reclaim flag so driver shouldn't use the flag
>> -     for own purpose.
>> +     as PG_isolated under lock_page(). So if a CPU encounters PG_isolated
>> +     non-lru movable page, it can skip it. Driver doesn't need to manipulate the
> 
>          non-LRU
> 
>> +     flag because VM will set/clear it automatically. Keep in mind that if the
>> +     driver sees a PG_isolated page, it means the page has been isolated by the
>> +     VM so it shouldn't touch the page.lru field.
>> +     The PG_isolated flag is aliased with the PG_reclaim flag so drivers
>> +     shouldn't use PG_isolated for its own purposes.
>>   
>>   Monitoring Migration
>>   =====================
>> @@ -266,8 +270,8 @@ The following events (counters) can be used to monitor page migration.
>>      512.
>>   
>>   2. PGMIGRATE_FAIL: Normal page migration failure. Same counting rules as for
>> -   _SUCCESS, above: this will be increased by the number of subpages, if it was
>> -   a THP.
>> +   PGMIGRATE_SUCCESS, above: this will be increased by the number of subpages,
>> +   if it was a THP.
>>   
>>   3. THP_MIGRATION_SUCCESS: A THP was migrated without being split.
>>   

Thanks for the suggestions. I'll post a v2 with the above changes.

I also forgot to mention which tree these should go to.
It applies cleanly to the latest linux or linux-mm so I don't think there is
a merge conflict reason pushing this to a particular tree.
Maybe Andrew can pick this up for linux-mm since it is VM related.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists