lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:58:28 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
        Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT 06/11] mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Simplify with optional clock and
 dev_err_probe()



On 9/2/2020 12:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Only -ENOENT from devm_clk_get() means that clock is not present in
> device tree.  Other errors have their own meaning and should not be
> ignored.
> 
> Simplify getting the clock which is in fact optional and also use
> dev_err_probe() for handling deferred.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>

This is actually an open coded version of devm_clk_get_optional(), so 
this is fine:

Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ