[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200903141310.GY35926@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 16:13:10 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
npiggin@...il.com, elver@...gle.com, jgross@...e.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
joel@...lfernandes.org, svens@...ux.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 04:00:47PM +0200, peterz@...radead.org wrote:
> I stuck a tracepoint in intel_idle and had a rummage around. The below
> seems to work for me now.
Note that this will insta-kill all trace_*_rcuidle() tracepoint that are
actually used in rcuidle.
A git-grep seems to suggest the remaining users are:
- arch/arm
- arch/arm64 -- IPI tracepoint that are ordered incorrectly in
their entry code,
- runtime pm
- common clk -- these both need re-ordering somehow
- trace_preemptirq -- this is going to be interesting for
those archs that idle with IRQs enabled
- printk -- we shouldn't be printk()-ing from idle, and if we are,
missing this is the least of our problems.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists