[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e857400e-f6e8-9d84-804e-88f3c34edb50@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:53:02 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: beanhuo@...ron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] use generic_file_buffered_read()
On 9/4/20 3:13 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>
>
> Bean Huo (2):
> block: use generic_file_buffered_read()
> fs: isofs: use generic_file_buffered_read()
The change is fine, but the title/commit message should reflect that
this is just a comment change. The way it currently reads, it sounds
like a functional change where something is switched over to using
generic_file_buffered_read().
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists