lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e857400e-f6e8-9d84-804e-88f3c34edb50@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:53:02 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     beanhuo@...ron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] use generic_file_buffered_read()

On 9/4/20 3:13 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> 
> 
> Bean Huo (2):
>   block: use generic_file_buffered_read()
>   fs: isofs: use generic_file_buffered_read()

The change is fine, but the title/commit message should reflect that
this is just a comment change. The way it currently reads, it sounds
like a functional change where something is switched over to using
generic_file_buffered_read().

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ