lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e35560d7ecf257a87dce544fe3a4d58e2998465b.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 07 Sep 2020 13:37:11 +0200
From:   Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     beanhuo@...ron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] use generic_file_buffered_read()

On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 10:53 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Bean Huo (2):
> >    block: use generic_file_buffered_read()
> >    fs: isofs: use generic_file_buffered_read()
> 
> The change is fine, but the title/commit message should reflect that
> this is just a comment change. The way it currently reads, it sounds
> like a functional change where something is switched over to using
> generic_file_buffered_read().
> 

Hi Jens
Indeed, it's easy to mistake this for a functional change, but it's
actually a comment change. I have corrected them in the new patch, you
can check now.

thanks,
Bean

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ