[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200904043847.g4ss3o4uofwujnyk@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:08:47 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, sudeep.holla@....com, will@...nel.org,
valentin.schneider@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] cpufreq: improve frequency invariance support
On 03-09-20, 14:32, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> Hi Rafael, Viresh,
>
> Would it be okay for you to apply this series, as the majority of
> changes are in cpufreq? For arch_topology and arm64 changes, they have
> been reviewed and acked-by Catalin and Sudeep.
>
> Also, please let me know if I should send v6 with Sudeep's Reviewed-by/s
> applied.
No need to resend. Rafael will apply these with the tags.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists