lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200904043847.g4ss3o4uofwujnyk@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:08:47 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, sudeep.holla@....com, will@...nel.org,
        valentin.schneider@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] cpufreq: improve frequency invariance support

On 03-09-20, 14:32, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> Hi Rafael, Viresh,
> 
> Would it be okay for you to apply this series, as the majority of
> changes are in cpufreq? For arch_topology and arm64 changes, they have
> been reviewed and acked-by Catalin and Sudeep.
> 
> Also, please let me know if I should send v6 with Sudeep's Reviewed-by/s
> applied.

No need to resend. Rafael will apply these with the tags.

-- 
viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ