[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iw4pRpGxXCR6pB9o+ynsNLAHPug-XyPWZktJ7i6TPtHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:12:24 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] cpufreq: improve frequency invariance support
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:39 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 03-09-20, 14:32, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> > Hi Rafael, Viresh,
> >
> > Would it be okay for you to apply this series, as the majority of
> > changes are in cpufreq? For arch_topology and arm64 changes, they have
> > been reviewed and acked-by Catalin and Sudeep.
> >
> > Also, please let me know if I should send v6 with Sudeep's Reviewed-by/s
> > applied.
>
> No need to resend. Rafael will apply these with the tags.
Right. :-)
So now applied as 5.10 material, sorry for the delay.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists