linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 02/16] s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to search for queue devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <37cd9b7e-a619-6603-7e47-f5e85814d673@de.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:11:59 +0200
From:   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     freude@...ux.ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com,
        pasic@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        kwankhede@...dia.com, fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
        david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
        gor@...ux.ibm.com, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 02/16] s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to
 search for queue devices



On 21.08.20 21:56, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> This patch refactor's the vfio_ap device driver to use the AP bus's
> ap_get_qdev() function to retrieve the vfio_ap_queue struct containing
> information about a queue that is bound to the vfio_ap device driver.
> The bus's ap_get_qdev() function retrieves the queue device from a
> hashtable keyed by APQN. This is much more efficient than looping over
> the list of devices attached to the AP bus by several orders of
> magnitude.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>

> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>

I think this can go. No need to mark that an earlier version of this patch had an issue.


[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> index f46dde56b464..a2aa05bec718 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <linux/hashtable.h>

I dont think that this header file needs it. Any user of it will now include this. 
Can you move this include into the respective C file when the hash stuff is
used?


Other than that this looks good.