[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99581cee-65fd-a622-ddc9-1a30e4638668@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:15:38 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: freude@...ux.ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com, fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 03/16] s390/vfio-ap: manage link between queue struct
and matrix mdev
On 21.08.20 21:56, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> index a2aa05bec718..57da703b549a 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct ap_matrix_mdev {
> struct kvm *kvm;
> struct kvm_s390_module_hook pqap_hook;
> struct mdev_device *mdev;
> + DECLARE_HASHTABLE(qtable, 8);
> };
Ah I think the include should go into this patch. But then you should revisit the patch description
of 2 as it talks about hashtables (but doesnt do anything about it).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists