[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b18ed556-09f5-1d2a-b8fc-56a52429addc@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 12:24:00 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>,
agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, plai@...eaurora.org,
bgoswami@...eaurora.org, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
rohitkr@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: V Sujith Kumar Reddy <vsujithk@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] ASoC: qcom: Add support for lpass hdmi driver
On 04/09/2020 12:21, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>>
>> Before going into detail review, I see real issue in the overall
>> approach here to add new interface to exiting lpass!!
>>
>> Intention of struct lpass_variant is to address differences between
>> SoCs or different lpass versions. But you should not duplicate this
>> and use it for addressing differences between each lpass interfaces!
>> All the dai related register offsets should still go in to this
>> structure and driver should be able to know which dai its talking to
>> based on snd_soc_dai_driver id and select correct register offset.
>>
> Do You suggest to use separate structure like struct
> lpass_hdmi_interface in lpass_data?
No, you should just put every thing lpass_variant as you did but no "id"
thing in that.
--srini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists