[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200904143848.535d4c13@coco.lan>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 14:38:48 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linuxarm@...wei.com, mauro.chehab@...wei.com,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] misc: hisi_hikey_usb: add support for Hikey 970
Em Fri, 4 Sep 2020 13:23:03 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> escreveu:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 12:23:31PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > + regulator = devm_regulator_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "hub-vdd");
> > + if (IS_ERR(regulator)) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(regulator) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> > + dev_info(&pdev->dev,
> > + "waiting for hub-vdd-supply to be probed\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(regulator);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* let it fall back to regulator dummy */
> > + regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "hub-vdd");
> > + if (IS_ERR(regulator)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > + "get hub-vdd-supply failed with error %ld\n",
> > + PTR_ERR(regulator));
> > + return PTR_ERR(regulator);
> > + }
> > + }
>
> This seems weird - if the supply is non-optional why is the code trying
> with devm_regulator_get_optional()? Just use normal get directly.
That's meant to avoid problems with EPROBE_DEFER.
See, Hikey 970 need to initialize 4 drivers for the regulators:
SPMI core, SPMI bus controller, MFD and regulator. This can take
some time. So, a first call to *regulator_get() may return
EPROBE_DEFER, specially if both regulator drivers and USB HUB
are builtin.
I ended doing the same as some other DRM drivers do (like adv7535).
> > + ret = regulator_set_voltage(regulator, 3300000, 3300000);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "set hub-vdd-supply voltage failed\n");
>
> Unless the device is actively managing the voltage at runtime it should
> just let the voltage be set by machine constraints, most of the time
> this will do nothing. This only sets the voltage in this one place.
Ok, I'll drop this.
> > + hub_reset_en_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node,
> > + "hub_reset_en_gpio", 0);
> > + if (!gpio_is_valid(hub_reset_en_gpio)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get a valid reset gpio\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
>
> Why not just use devm_gpio_request() which already asks for the GPIO by
> name?
Makes sense.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists