[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eendo51o.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 13:44:19 -0400
From: fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com,
x86@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, rostedt@...dmis.org,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, cameron@...dycamel.com,
oleg@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
systemtap@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/21] kprobes: Unify kretprobe trampoline handlers and make kretprobe lockless
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> writes:
> Sorry, for noticing this point, I Cc'd to systemtap. Is systemtap taking
> care of spinlock too?
On PRREMPT_RT configurations, systemtap uses the raw_spinlock_t
types/functions, to keep its probe handlers as atomic as we can make them.
- FChE
Powered by blists - more mailing lists