[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200907174436.GK3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:44:37 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Karcher <kernel@...rcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: fix syscall tracing
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:52:20AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Rich!
>
> On 9/3/20 6:16 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> >> I can confirm that this patch fixes both strace for me and does not break libseccomp,
> >> I have run the libseccomp testsuite with my patch for SuperH support applied on top
> >> of a rebased libseccomp with the 32-bit fixes. Attaching the testsuite log.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
> >
> > Great! Thanks!
>
> Can we still get this merged as a hotfix for 5.9?
Yes, fixes for regressions in the same release cycle are in-scope (the
whole point of having -rc's). I have at least one other fix that needs
to go in too and was just giving it a little time to make sure
everything's ok now and that there are no more.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists