[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfrYJrkX2RfjXkCLtyzkM8MemTuUgEu_n-E+2mngk9mbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:05:54 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/23] gpio: mockup: refactor the module init function
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:57 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:45:40PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > This is in preparation for dynamically created chips.
> >
> > Let's split out the code that can be reused when creating chips at
> > run-time. Let's also move the code preparing the device properties into
> > a separate routine. This has the advantage of simplifying the error
> > handling.
>
> Almost all contents of this patch should go to proposed helper as I mentioned
> before. Will make this patch quite small and understandable.
>
Sorry, I'm not sure what you're referring to.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists