linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/23] gpio: mockup: refactor the module init function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200907115159.GZ1891694@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:51:59 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/23] gpio: mockup: refactor the module init function

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 01:05:54PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:57 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:45:40PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > >
> > > This is in preparation for dynamically created chips.
> > >
> > > Let's split out the code that can be reused when creating chips at
> > > run-time. Let's also move the code preparing the device properties into
> > > a separate routine. This has the advantage of simplifying the error
> > > handling.
> >
> > Almost all contents of this patch should go to proposed helper as I mentioned
> > before. Will make this patch quite small and understandable.

> Sorry, I'm not sure what you're referring to.

I meant if you move changes done here to the patch where I complained about
indentation you might have better series. Have you considered that?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko