[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b092ef9e-b403-751e-22c3-65aa840267e6@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:35:28 +0200
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: dts: exynos: Add assigned clock parent to
CMU in Exynos3250
On 06.09.2020 14:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>>> index a1e93fb7f694..89b160280469 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
>>> @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@
>>> compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-cmu";
>>> reg = <0x10030000 0x20000>;
>>> #clock-cells = <1>;
>>> + clocks = <&cmu CLK_FIN_PLL>;
>> This is not a correct input clock for this CMU. Please assign it to
>> xusbxti, xxti or xtcxo in the respective board dts, as this is a board
>> property.
> Makes sense, although all this is kind of a hack as neither the bindings
> nor the driver take the input clock.
I think we should update the bindings so possible input clocks
to the CMU are documented for all SoCs. This is actually a bug
in the clock controller DT bindings that the input clocks are
missing. Then the driver would handle both the old and the
updated bindings but the "clocks" property would be documented
as mandatory. I will try to have a look at this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists