[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200908084915.5a8c18fc@coco.lan>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:49:15 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc: Yu Chen <chenyu56@...wei.com>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
suzhuangluan@...ilicon.com, kongfei@...ilicon.com,
liuyu712@...ilicon.com, wanghu17@...ilicon.com,
butao@...ilicon.com, chenyao11@...wei.com,
fangshengzhou@...ilicon.com, lipengcheng8@...wei.com,
songxiaowei@...ilicon.com, xuyiping@...ilicon.com,
xuyoujun4@...wei.com, yudongbin@...ilicon.com,
zangleigang@...ilicon.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Binghui Wang <wangbinghui@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/13] usb: dwc3: Add splitdisable quirk for
Hisilicon Kirin Soc
Em Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:09:46 +0300
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org> escreveu:
> >> Why does it affect only Hikey kirin?
> >
> > As John Stultz didn't re-submit this one (and looking at the DT
> > between Kirin 960 and 970 from the original Kernel 4.9 official
> > drivers), I suspect that only Kirin 970 requires this quirk.
> >
> > It could well be due to some Dwc3 revision, but it could also be due
> > to some differences at the USB part of the SoC, as there are a
>
> the reason I ask is that if it's caused by dwc3 revision, then we don't
> need the extra dt property, we can rely on a revision check. If it's
> something that can't be detected in runtime, then we need a property.
Yeah, if it would be possible to auto-detect, that would be
better. Yet, hard to say if it would be possible to do that,
without access to the Dwc3 docs, and without different hardware
for testing it.
> > few other things different between hikey 960 and 970: it has a
> > different PHY driver, and there are also some differences at the
> > USB HUB which is connected into it.
> >
> > On both devices, the USB physical ports are actually connected
> > into a HUB. In the case of Hikey 970, the hub seems to be a
> > TI TUSB8041 4-Port Hub:
> >
> > $ lsusb
> > Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0451:8140 Texas Instruments, Inc. TUSB8041 4-Port Hub
> > Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
> > Bus 001 Device 004: ID 090c:1000 Silicon Motion, Inc. - Taiwan (formerly Feiya Technology Corp.) Flash Drive
> > Bus 001 Device 003: ID 413c:301a Dell Computer Corp. Dell MS116 Optical Mouse
> > Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0451:8142 Texas Instruments, Inc. TUSB8041 4-Port Hub
> > Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
> >
> >> What's the dwc3 revision on
> >> that SoC (grep SNPSID /sys/kernel/debugfs/*dwc3/regdump)?
> >
> > GSNPSID = 0x33313130
>
> This isn't even listed as a known revision in dwc3/core.h. Thinh, could
> the issue being described here caused by a known Erratum with this
> particular revision?
Maybe. Again, hard to tell without any documentation from Synopsys.
Maybe some of the Synopsys folks at USB MK can shed a light.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists