linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] dwc3-of-simple: add support for Hikey 970

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:53:07 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:     linuxarm@...wei.com, mauro.chehab@...wei.com,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] dwc3-of-simple: add support for Hikey 970

Em Mon,  7 Sep 2020 17:59:34 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> escreveu:

> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
> index 8852fbfdead4..2d497165efe2 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ static int dwc3_of_simple_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	 * Some controllers need to toggle the usb3-otg reset before trying to
>  	 * initialize the PHY, otherwise the PHY times out.
>  	 */
> -	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "rockchip,rk3399-dwc3"))
> +	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "rockchip,rk3399-dwc3") ||
> +	    of_device_is_compatible(np, "hisilicon,hi3670-dwc3"))
>  		simple->need_reset = true;

It turns that this hunk caused Serror during my suspend/resume tests.

Without this one, the driver works just fine.

As you already applied this patch, do you prefer a patch dropping it,
or should I send a version 2 without it?

Thanks,
Mauro