[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200908085521.4db22680.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:55:21 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, thomas.lendacky@....com,
david@...son.dropbear.id.au, linuxram@...ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 00:39:51 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> > to validate VIRTIO device features.
>
> Michael, is this going in via your tree?
>
I believe Michael's tree is the right place for this, but I can also
queue it if I get an ack on patch 1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists