[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200908035506-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 03:57:30 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
cohuck@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, thomas.lendacky@....com,
david@...son.dropbear.id.au, linuxram@...ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:39:51AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> > to validate VIRTIO device features.
>
> Michael, is this going in via your tree?
I guess so. Still not really happy about second-guessing
the hypervisor, but this got acks from others
so maybe I'm wrong in this instance. Won't be the first time.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists