linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ASoC: Add sdw stream operations to dailink ops.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:30:00 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Cc:     Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, vinod.koul@...aro.org,
        tiwai@...e.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com,
        hui.wang@...onical.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        jank@...ence.com, mengdong.lin@...el.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
        rander.wang@...ux.intel.com, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ASoC: Add sdw stream operations to dailink ops.

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 02:26:14PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:

>   "[PATCH v2 0/4] soundwire: Remove sdw stream operations from Intel" and
> cannot be used standalone. I believe that one maintainer should accept it or
> there should be a co-ordination between Mark and Vinod to push this in sync.
> We should really settle, how to accept such changes. I believe that Vinod
> should take it with the ack from Mark for this case. Please, don't require to
> split changes which depends on each other.

Or just tag the bit from Soundwire that needs to be shared so I can pull
it in which is the more usual way to handle this sort of thing.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)