lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:26:14 +0200
From:   Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
To:     Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc:     pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, vinod.koul@...aro.org,
        tiwai@...e.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com,
        hui.wang@...onical.com, broonie@...nel.org,
        srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, jank@...ence.com,
        mengdong.lin@...el.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
        rander.wang@...ux.intel.com, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ASoC: Add sdw stream operations to dailink ops.

Dne 04. 09. 20 v 20:28 Bard Liao napsal(a):
> Sdw stream operation APIs can be called once per stream. Move these
> operations to dailink ops. The linked series is "soundwire: Remove sdw
> stream operations from Intel soundwire dai".
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> 
> Changes in v3:
>  - s/ASOC/ASoC
> 
> Pierre-Louis Bossart (3):
>   ASoC: soc-dai: clarify return value for get_sdw_stream()
>   ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw: add dailink .trigger callback
>   ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw: add dailink .prepare and .hw_free callback
> 
>  include/sound/soc-dai.h          |  3 +-
>  sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

This patchset depends on the SoundWire patchset
  "[PATCH v2 0/4] soundwire: Remove sdw stream operations from Intel" and
cannot be used standalone. I believe that one maintainer should accept it or
there should be a co-ordination between Mark and Vinod to push this in sync.
We should really settle, how to accept such changes. I believe that Vinod
should take it with the ack from Mark for this case. Please, don't require to
split changes which depends on each other.

For all above patches (I tested them):

Acked-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>

-- 
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ