linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Enable addition power management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4770327e-84fb-0543-097c-6525d762a01f@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:14:54 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, aford@...conembedded.com,
        hns@...delico.com, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Enable addition power
 management

On 10/09/2020 20:01, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:59:23 -0500
> Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> The bandgap sensor can be idled when the processor is too, but it
>> isn't currently being done, so the power consumption of OMAP3
>> boards can elevated if the bangap sensor is enabled.
>>
>> This patch attempts to use some additional power management
>> to idle the clock to the bandgap when not needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> ---
>> V2: Fix issue where variable stating the suspend mode isn't being
>>     properly set and cleared.
>>
> hmm, it is not in linux-next. Can we expect that for v5.10?

The reason I did not pick this patch is because lkp reported an error on it.

https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=159788472017308&w=2




-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog