[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200910200152.72cc5d9f@aktux>
Date:   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:01:52 +0200
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, aford@...conembedded.com,
        hns@...delico.com, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Enable addition power
 management
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:59:23 -0500
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
> The bandgap sensor can be idled when the processor is too, but it
> isn't currently being done, so the power consumption of OMAP3
> boards can elevated if the bangap sensor is enabled.
> 
> This patch attempts to use some additional power management
> to idle the clock to the bandgap when not needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> ---
> V2: Fix issue where variable stating the suspend mode isn't being
>     properly set and cleared.
> 
hmm, it is not in linux-next. Can we expect that for v5.10?
Regards,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
