linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 142/206] gfs2: fix use-after-free on transaction ail lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:43:19 +0200
From:   Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>,
        Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, Daniel.Craig@...ro.au,
        Nicolas Courtel <courtel@...a.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 142/206] gfs2: fix use-after-free on transaction ail
 lists

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 09:57:50PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 83d060ca8d90fa1e3feac227f995c013100862d3 ]
> 
> Before this patch, transactions could be merged into the system
> transaction by function gfs2_merge_trans(), but the transaction ail
> lists were never merged. Because the ail flushing mechanism can run
> separately, bd elements can be attached to the transaction's buffer
> list during the transaction (trans_add_meta, etc) but quickly moved
> to its ail lists. Later, in function gfs2_trans_end, the transaction
> can be freed (by gfs2_trans_end) while it still has bd elements
> queued to its ail lists, which can cause it to either lose track of
> the bd elements altogether (memory leak) or worse, reference the bd
> elements after the parent transaction has been freed.
> 
> Although I've not seen any serious consequences, the problem becomes
> apparent with the previous patch's addition of:
> 
> 	gfs2_assert_warn(sdp, list_empty(&tr->tr_ail1_list));
> 
> to function gfs2_trans_free().
> 
> This patch adds logic into gfs2_merge_trans() to move the merged
> transaction's ail lists to the sdp transaction. This prevents the
> use-after-free. To do this properly, we need to hold the ail lock,
> so we pass sdp into the function instead of the transaction itself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
>  fs/gfs2/log.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/log.c b/fs/gfs2/log.c
> index d3f0612e33471..06752db213d21 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/log.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/log.c
> @@ -877,8 +877,10 @@ void gfs2_log_flush(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_glock *gl, u32 flags)
>   * @new: New transaction to be merged
>   */
>  
> -static void gfs2_merge_trans(struct gfs2_trans *old, struct gfs2_trans *new)
> +static void gfs2_merge_trans(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *new)
>  {
> +	struct gfs2_trans *old = sdp->sd_log_tr;
> +
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(TR_ATTACHED, &old->tr_flags));
>  
>  	old->tr_num_buf_new	+= new->tr_num_buf_new;
> @@ -890,6 +892,11 @@ static void gfs2_merge_trans(struct gfs2_trans *old, struct gfs2_trans *new)
>  
>  	list_splice_tail_init(&new->tr_databuf, &old->tr_databuf);
>  	list_splice_tail_init(&new->tr_buf, &old->tr_buf);
> +
> +	spin_lock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
> +	list_splice_tail_init(&new->tr_ail1_list, &old->tr_ail1_list);
> +	list_splice_tail_init(&new->tr_ail2_list, &old->tr_ail2_list);
> +	spin_unlock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void log_refund(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr)
> @@ -901,7 +908,7 @@ static void log_refund(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr)
>  	gfs2_log_lock(sdp);
>  
>  	if (sdp->sd_log_tr) {
> -		gfs2_merge_trans(sdp->sd_log_tr, tr);
> +		gfs2_merge_trans(sdp, tr);
>  	} else if (tr->tr_num_buf_new || tr->tr_num_databuf_new) {
>  		gfs2_assert_withdraw(sdp, test_bit(TR_ALLOCED, &tr->tr_flags));
>  		sdp->sd_log_tr = tr;
> -- 
> 2.25.1

In Debian two user confirmed issues on writing on a GFS2 partition
with this commit applied. The initial Debian report is at
https://bugs.debian.org/968567 and Daniel Craig reported it into
Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209217 .

Writing to a gfs2 filesystem fails and results in a soft lookup of the
machine for kernels with that commit applied. I cannot reporduce the
issue myself due not having a respective setup available, but Daniel
described a minimal serieos of steps to reproduce the issue.

This might affect as well other stable series where this commit was
applied, as there was a similar report for someone running 5.4.58 in
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/2020-August/msg00000.html
.

Regards,
Salvatore