[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200911122922.GJ1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:29:22 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bristot@...hat.com, swood@...hat.com,
Vincent Donnefort <Vincent.Donnefort@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/hotplug: Ensure only per-cpu kthreads run
during hotplug
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 01:17:45PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > @@ -6968,6 +7064,8 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cp
> > */
> > synchronize_rcu();
> >
> > + balance_push_set(cpu, true);
> > +
>
> IIUC this is going to make every subsequent finish_lock_switch()
> migrate the switched-to task if it isn't a pcpu kthread. So this is going
> to lead to a dance of
>
> switch_to(<task0>) -> switch_to(<stopper>) -> switch_to(<task1>) -> switch_to(<stopper>) ...
>
> Wouldn't it be better to batch all those in a migrate_tasks() sibling that
> skips pcpu kthreads?
That's 'difficult', this is hotplug, performance is not a consideration.
Basically we don't have an iterator for the runqueues, so finding these
tasks is hard.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists