[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jhjo8mc5sql.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:48:50 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bristot@...hat.com, swood@...hat.com,
Vincent Donnefort <Vincent.Donnefort@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/hotplug: Ensure only per-cpu kthreads run during hotplug
On 11/09/20 13:29, peterz@...radead.org wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 01:17:45PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>
>> > @@ -6968,6 +7064,8 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cp
>> > */
>> > synchronize_rcu();
>> >
>> > + balance_push_set(cpu, true);
>> > +
>>
>> IIUC this is going to make every subsequent finish_lock_switch()
>> migrate the switched-to task if it isn't a pcpu kthread. So this is going
>> to lead to a dance of
>>
>> switch_to(<task0>) -> switch_to(<stopper>) -> switch_to(<task1>) -> switch_to(<stopper>) ...
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to batch all those in a migrate_tasks() sibling that
>> skips pcpu kthreads?
>
> That's 'difficult', this is hotplug, performance is not a consideration.
>
Aye aye.
The reason I'm trying to care about this is (don't wince too hard) for that
CPU pause thing [1]. Vincent's been the one doing all the actual work so I
should let him pitch in, but TL;DR if we could "relatively quickly" migrate
all !pcpu tasks after clearing the active bit, we could stop hotplug there
and have our "CPU pause" thing.
[1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/820825/
> Basically we don't have an iterator for the runqueues, so finding these
> tasks is hard.
Mmph right, we'd pretty much have to "enjoy" iterating & skipping pcpu
threads every __pick_migrate_task() call...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists