[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200911093221.GD1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:32:21 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Cc: luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] kernel: Support TIF_SYSCALL_INTERCEPT flag
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> +static inline void __set_tsk_syscall_intercept(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + unsigned int type)
> +{
> + tsk->syscall_intercept |= type;
> +
> + if (tsk->syscall_intercept)
> + set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SYSCALL_INTERCEPT);
> +}
Did the above want to be:
unsigned int old = tsk->syscall_intercept;
tsk->syscall_intercept |= type;
if (!old)
set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SYSCALL_INTERCEPT)
?
> +static inline void __clear_tsk_syscall_intercept(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + unsigned int type)
> +{
> + tsk->syscall_intercept &= ~type;
> +
> + if (tsk->syscall_intercept == 0)
> + clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SYSCALL_INTERCEPT);
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists