[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200911093549.GE1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:35:49 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Cc: luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] kernel: entry: Support TIF_SYSCAL_INTERCEPT on
common entry code
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:40PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/entry-common.h b/include/linux/entry-common.h
> index efebbffcd5cc..72ce9ca860c6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/entry-common.h
> +++ b/include/linux/entry-common.h
> @@ -21,10 +21,6 @@
> # define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT (0)
> #endif
>
> -#ifndef _TIF_SECCOMP
> -# define _TIF_SECCOMP (0)
> -#endif
> -
> #ifndef _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT
> # define _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT (0)
> #endif
Why doesn't this add:
#ifndef _TIF_SYSCALL_INTERCEPT
#define _TIF_SYSCALL_INTERCEPT (0)
#endif
?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists