[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200911152225.GB20374@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:22:25 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kbuild: remove cc-option test of -fno-strict-overflow
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:51:17PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> The minimal compiler versions, GCC 4.9 and Clang 10 support this flag.
>
> Here is the godbolt:
> https://godbolt.org/z/odq8h9
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This, and the other patch (4/4 -- I didn't see 2 or 3), look good to me.
Are you taking them via the kbuild tree, or shall I queue them in the arm64
tree? Please just let me know what you prefer.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists