linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] kbuild: remove cc-option test of -fno-strict-overflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNASijUXVmZ+AfuGOnAFnbfUpr3S2ncSxABt4bGF+agxg+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 21:51:31 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kbuild: remove cc-option test of -fno-strict-overflow

Hi Will,

On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 12:22 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:51:17PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > The minimal compiler versions, GCC 4.9 and Clang 10 support this flag.
> >
> > Here is the godbolt:
> > https://godbolt.org/z/odq8h9
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >
> >  Makefile                          | 2 +-
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> This, and the other patch (4/4 -- I didn't see 2 or 3), look good to me.
> Are you taking them via the kbuild tree, or shall I queue them in the arm64
> tree? Please just let me know what you prefer.
>
> Will


I will apply all to the kbuild tree.
Your Ack is appreciated.

Thanks.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada