[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbwVLNbabGjwdcKvcKrTWup1PQhoHPivQE2S3ZiPfNV2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:15:44 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl/actions: Constify static variables
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 12:43 AM Rikard Falkeborn
<rikard.falkeborn@...il.com> wrote:
> Constify a couple of static variables which are not modified to allow
> the compiler to put them in read-only memory. Patch 1/3 is probably
> the most important one since those structs contain function pointer.
> The patches are independent, and can be applied in any order.
> Compile-tested only.
>
> Rikard Falkeborn (3):
> pinctrl: actions: pinctrl-owl: Constify owl_pinctrl_ops and
> owl_pinmux_ops
> pinctrl: actions: pinctrl-s700: Constify s700_padinfo[]
> pinctrl: actions: pinctrl-s900: Constify s900_padinfo[]
Patch series applied,
thanks!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists